Comparing Data from PM-EAC Report and Census Statistics
In recent times, there has been a surge in the dissemination of misinformation regarding the demographic trends of religious minorities in India. A recent report by the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Committee (PM-EAC) has been the subject of misrepresentation, particularly concerning the Hindu and Muslim populations. Let’s delve into the discrepancies between the PM-EAC report’s findings and official census data to debunk these misleading claims.
PM-EAC Report vs. Census Data: A Comparative Analysis:
| Metrics | PM-EAC Report (1950-2015) | Census Data (1951-2011) |
|---|---|---|
| Hindu Population Share | -7.82% | -4.3% |
| Muslim Population Share | +4.25% | +4.4% |
PM-EAC Report: The PM-EAC report highlighted a decline in the Hindu population share by 7.82% over 65 years, contrasting with a rise of 4.25% in the Muslim population share. However, a closer examination reveals that these figures are derived from percentage points and not absolute numbers.
Census Data: Contrary to the PM-EAC report’s claims, official census data paints a different picture. Between 1951 and 2011, the Hindu population increased by approximately 66.43 crore individuals, while the Muslim population rose by 13.69 crore individuals. The percentage share of Hindus decreased by 4.3%, while that of Muslims increased by 4.4%.
Debunking Misinformation: The selective portrayal of data to emphasize the increase in the Muslim population, as highlighted by certain news organizations and social media users, is not only inaccurate but also misleading. Poonam Muttreja, Executive Director of the Population Foundation of India, has underscored the importance of considering broader demographic trends rather than cherry-picking statistics.
Decadal Growth Rate: Contrary to popular misconceptions, the decadal growth rate for Muslims has been declining over the past three decades, outpacing that of Hindus. This trend aligns with census data, which reflects similar patterns of population change.
Conclusion: In conclusion, it is crucial to scrutinize information before accepting it at face value. Misleading narratives based on selective data interpretation only serve to perpetuate misconceptions and undermine informed discourse. By comparing findings from the PM-EAC report with official census statistics, we can debunk misinformation and foster a more nuanced understanding of demographic trends in India.
READ ALSO-WhatsApp Unveils Fresh Design Update for iOS and Android: What’s New
About the Author
